Have your say! "Free Speech" or Muslim bashing? Do you support Iraq troop withdrawal? Iran invasion?
  • Please read our posting policy before adding a comment
  • Target areas: Operation "Anyone But Labour" 2006
  • Monday, March 28, 2005

    Panel ignored "sensitive" evidence on detainee

    According to this article, from the Washington Post, a "military tribunal" (also known as a kangaroo court) ruled, last year that a Guantanamo detainee could remain indefinitely at the torture chamber, despite evidence that the man had absolutely no link to terrorists at all:

    Kurnaz has been detained at Guantanamo Bay since at least January 2002. "The U.S. government has known for almost two years that he's innocent of these charges," said Baher Azmy, Kurnaz's attorney. "That begs a lot of questions about what the purpose of Guantanamo really is. He can't be useful to them. He has no intelligence for them. Why in the world is he still there?"
    A good question. See all recent "A Logical Voice" posts


    Post a Comment

    << Home