Have your say! "Free Speech" or Muslim bashing? Do you support Iraq troop withdrawal? Iran invasion?
  • Please read our posting policy before adding a comment
  • Target areas: Operation "Anyone But Labour" 2006
  • Thursday, March 31, 2005

    New revelations on "911"

    From DC Indymedia: New Revelation on 911

    Sgt. Matthew Tartaglia was a rescue worker at 9/11. He joined Alex to discuss how rescuers were prevented from doing their jobs properly, were not protected from harmful asbestos, and how explosives, possibly tactical nukes, brought down the towers.
    See all recent "A Logical Voice" posts

    5 Comments:

    At 3/31/2005 02:35:00 pm, Blogger DJEB said...

    Two airplanes brought down the towers. If there were any nukes involved, including tactical nuke, which do have a large yield, there would have been many more than two buildings collapsed. Furthermore, there would have been a visible and audible explosion no matter the explosive used. The suggestion of explosives playing a role in collapsing the building doesn't rise to the level of a joke. They were a somewhat poorly designed set of buildings that were hit by two airliners full of highly volatile jet fuel that brought them down.

     
    At 4/01/2005 12:57:00 am, Anonymous Anonymous said...

    For once I agree with DJEB ! The BBC had an excellent diagram and technical explanation of their collapse, don't know if it's still on their site or not.

     
    At 4/01/2005 02:23:00 am, Blogger DJEB said...

    Listen here.

     
    At 4/01/2005 02:34:00 am, Blogger DJEB said...

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

     
    At 4/01/2005 10:59:00 am, Blogger Voice 1 said...

    To be honest, I keep an open mind on this matter, which is why I occasionally post these articles, I find they are interesting, and there are some legitimate points made.

     

    Post a Comment

    << Home