Have your say! "Free Speech" or Muslim bashing? Do you support Iraq troop withdrawal? Iran invasion?
  • Please read our posting policy before adding a comment
  • Target areas: Operation "Anyone But Labour" 2006
  • Tuesday, December 28, 2004

    "Need I remind you of how their elections were held in the United States?"

    That quote from Vladimir Putin, the Russian president. Obviously he is right to point out that the rogue regime in Washington has absolutely no business telling other countries how elections should be run, when there is so much evidence of vote fraud and "irregularities" in the US.


    At 12/28/2004 08:58:00 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

    "when there is so much evidence of vote fraud and "irregularities" in the US."

    You see, that is the problem, there is no evidence of wide spread voter fraud in the US. A few problems here and there but no evidence of widespread voter fraud.

    If there was, don't you think Kerry and the Democrats would still be suing in the courts?

    Jesse Jackson says there was wide spread voting fraud in Ohio but Kerry, who lost the Presidentcy on Ohio's outcome, says there wasn't.

    Accuasations are not "evidence" and every accuasation has been disproved.

    At 12/28/2004 09:13:00 pm, Blogger Voice 1 said...

    I think you'll find that every accusation has not been disproved. In fact if you read through the archives there are quite a few accusations which haven't even been denied.

    At 12/28/2004 09:42:00 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

    "In fact if you read through the archives there are quite a few accusations which haven't even been denied."

    I have read through a lot of them. I'm the one that has debunked most of them for you. In fact I debunk most of what you post. I posted that once before and I think you deleted my post about having done so.

    Remember the one about the software guy that built the software to switch votes from Kerry to Bush? I debunked that for you today. The guy is a fraud exposed by Olberman, the most far left nut out there and no friend of Bush.

    Ask yourself this, if there was so much wide spread voting fraud, how come none have been proven?

    At 12/29/2004 11:45:00 am, Blogger Voice 1 said...

    I notice you haven't made a comment on the post about Kerry's lawyers filing a suit to ensure the ballots and voting machines are protected. If vote fraud didn't take place, then why do these sorts of suits need to be filed to protect the integrity of the machines and ballots? And why do cheat sheets need to be used rather than actually counting the ballots themselves?

    At 12/29/2004 03:44:00 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

    And, just to point out, I haven't deleted any comments. If people wish to make comments relating to the message in question, then they are free to do so, whatever their views.

    At 1/31/2005 05:46:00 am, Anonymous Anonymous said...

    Blah, blah, blah.

    "[A]n additional 93,000 voters had gone to the polls yet machines had registered no preference of theirs for President. Only a manual recount can tell us for sure what happened to those 93,000 ballots.

    "[E]lection officials in Franklin County admitted a computer error on Election Night had tallied 4,258 votes for Bush in a precinct where only 638 people voted. That correction alone will drop Bush's margin by 3,620.
    - http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/12/03/164231&mode=thread&tid=25

    Me 3:16


    Post a Comment

    << Home